Towards an Effective Multi-Stakeholder Consultation Process: Applying the Imagine Method in Context of Abu Dhabi’s Education Policy

نویسنده

  • Sami Mahroum
چکیده

Copyright and Moral Rights for the articles on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. For more information on Open Research Online's data policy on reuse of materials please consult the policies page. Abstract This paper is concerned with the many interleaving issues that emerge when engaging multiple stakeholders in decision-making. Whilst recognising the intrinsic value of group work and keeping in mind the numerous issues that obstruct group work (including multiple roles for participants, bias due to domination and distortion emerging from uneven group inputs), we applied the Imagine method to propose a new framework-the 'Multiple Formation Consultation Framework' (MFCF)-for organising effective multi-stakeholder consultations along the Policy Sciences Framework. Our proposed framework was applied in the context of education policy in the Emirate of Abu Dhabi, where 24 small group formations were tasked and assessed in a systemic manner. Evidence from the exercise suggests that: (1) when moving participants from heterogeneous to homogenous groups, the working of the groups became more focused and the outcomes gained greater clarity in terms of the thinking of group members. (2) Yet, when groups moved from homogenous formations to heterogeneous, they became more inquisitive and explored broader aspects of the tasks at hand. (3) A repeat of the process over two-day period where different members of the groups experience both homogenous and heterogeneous formations back and forth (in order to capture the unique value emerging from each composition) have led to more efficient and effective working and outcomes of the groups. 1. Introduction Engaging multiple stakeholders in decision-making has gained more prominence in recent years. Enhanced by a customer-oriented public sector management philosophy and participatory approaches to planning and policymaking, stakeholder participation has been perceived to add value and improve the quality of public decisions (Abelson et al. The rise of collaborative governance as an approach to decision-making and policy formulation has further contributed to the propagation of multi-stakeholder engagement processes involving both multi-sectoral state and non-state actors (Ansil & Gash, 2008). In this context, the concept of a 'Collaborative Governance Regime' has been proposed as a " system in which cross-boundary collaboration represents the predominate mode for conduct, decision-making and activity " (Emerson et al., 2011:10). Around the world, there has been a growing interest in moving public policymaking (pertaining to education, health, environment, among other policy areas) in a more participatory direction. Indeed, the OECD, in …

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

تبیین روش‌شناسی تحلیل ذی‌نفعان و کاربرد آن در خط‌مشی‌گذاری عمومی

The purpose of this research is to study policy issues and providing operational and scientific guidelines for policy makers. Policy research methods examine the factors influencing public policy and the impacts of policies on society and environment, using different methods to reach this end. Stakeholder analysis is one of these methods that emphasizes on comments of stakeholders to be taken i...

متن کامل

Power and Agenda-Setting in Tanzanian Health Policy: An Analysis of Stakeholder Perspectives

Background Global health policy is created largely through a collaborative process between development agencies and aid-recipient governments, yet it remains unclear whether governments retain ownership over the creation of policy in their own countries. An assessment of the power structure in this relationship and its influence over agenda-setting is thus the first step towards understanding w...

متن کامل

Global Health in the Anthropocene: Moving Beyond Resilience and Capitalism; Comment on “Health Promotion in an Age of Normative Equity and Rampant Inequality”

There has been much reflection on the need for a new understanding of global health and the urgency of a paradigm shift to address global health issues. A crucial question is whether this is still possible in current modes of global governance based on capitalist values. Four reflections are provided. (1) Ecological–centered values must become central in any future global health framework. (2) ...

متن کامل

Innovation in Multi-stakeholder Engagement

A Working Paper is the author's intellectual property. It is intended as a means to promote research to interested readers. Its content should not be copied or hosted on any server without written permission from [email protected] Find more INSEAD papers at Abstract This paper uses an innovative methodology-the Triple Task-to propose a new framework for organising multi-stakeholders in...

متن کامل

Analysis of Lean Management Components in Education – A Qualitative research method based on grounded theory

The purpose of this study was to analyze the components of lean management and develop an appropriate model of lean management for Iran’s educational system. In this research, a qualitative research method based on grounded theory with Strauss-Corbin model was used and semi-structured interviews with 11 elites were continued by purposeful sampling method until theoretical saturation was achieve...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2017